Re: r239356: does it mean,
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:01 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> IL> The important point is that if you unplug the cable then plug it =
into a
>> IL> different network, now the right thing will happen -- you will =
acquire
>> IL> an address on the new network. That's the reason that this =
change is an
>> IL> important bugfix for a long standing (many many years) bug in =
freebsd's
>> IL> dhclient.
>> No, I'll be without dhclient at all, if I don't use devd :(. And
>> absence of devd is completely legal, and should be supported. It is
>> perfectly valid and sensible setup for small devices (think:
>> MIPS-based routers, which are started to be supported now), where =
devd
>> could be very costly in both terms of flash size (it is C++
>> application and need C++ runtime!) and memory (only devd event on
>> such devices are this cable plugging/unplugging -- so using devd
>> doesn't add any value for such setups).
>>=20
>=20
> I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
> apps. The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: =
374k
> statically linked (so it already includes this "C++ runtime" that you
> think is large). We routinely deploy embedded systems that use apps
> written exclusively in C++, on systems that only have 32 or 64mb of =
ram.
> We've been doing so since the days when the biggest compact flash card
> you could buy was 64mb.
C++ isn't the problem. Devd's size wouldn't be any smaller if I'd =
written it in pure C. People have sent me patches that move it to pure =
C over time. Yet, when written in C, the binaries are the same size =
(well, within 10k), and the run-time speed and memory consumption are =
comparable. Devd was written with the small, embedded system in mind, =
and was always considered to be on the path to being mandatory (you are =
free to write your own devd-like program, if you like btw).
Haven't looked at the dhclient issues surrounding this tread, but C++ =
size and bloat of devd is an argument not supported by the objective =
facts.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 16 之 28 篇):