Re: Speaking of ship blockers for 9....

Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Let me give you link to my branch of pf:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-June/006643.html
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-June/006662.html
> 
> In that branch the code that puts the "reverse" pointer on state keys,
> as well as the m_addr_changed() function and the pf_compare_state_keys()
> had been cut away.
> 
> So, this exact bug definitely can't be reproduced there. However, others
> may hide in :)

Thanks.  I'll be able to work on this next week.  My system is
pretty similar to yours - 16 cores, full BGP RIB, 20+ VLANs + CARP
on 4*bce(4), PF+Sync, 400k+ states, NAT, tables, anchors etc.

The complication is that the production system is on 8 and the
pfsync is incompatible with 9 and CURRENT.  And, 9/CURRENT is
unuseable for me as a backup without this fix because of the state
mismatch rate.

Ian

-- 
Ian Freislich
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"