Re: portmaster and pkgng

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/07/23 18:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/6 (看更多)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC5E43248A711064666F0410D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23/07/2012 10:31, Hartmann, O. wrote: > portmaster now is not recognizing anymore the format of the /var/db/pkg= > folder - for those considered the knowledged no surprise, for me simply= > the indication that portmaster usage isn't usable as usual. You need to patch portmaster separately from installing pkgng. Once that is done, it doesn't complain about missing stuff in /var/db/pkg Note: use the latest version of the patch from git in preference to what is included in pkgng distfiles: the patch gets updated following portmaster's release schedule, not pkgng's. Here: https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/raw/master/ports/patch-portmaster-pkgn= g > Well, if I understand it right, pkg is considered to be for binary > packages and does not make portmaster obsolete, if I'm inclined > compiling my ports myself, am I right? Correct. > Well, I thought I read in here that pkg has now a much more > sophisticated tracking of dependencies - usage of SQLite implies, that > there is now a great opportunity of doing well in tracking problems and= > versioning (I might be wrong). Again, correct. pkgng replaces grepping through a lot of files under /var/db/pkg with doing some fairly simple SQL queries, and is in general a much faster at that sort of thing. > I tried to follow the chat on the list about pkgng, but for the rush I > didn't figured out whether portmaster is considered obsolete - I saw > patches for portupgrade flushing in, so my logic has been falsified by > that implicitely ... portmaster is definitely not obsolete. pkgng doesn't /do/ ports at all, only packages. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigC5E43248A711064666F0410D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlANHb8ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwd9QCfUVnK7ltcLqh8bVCwbKK7e6JI GdgAmwaJWreVD4TPeT4OZCPddX5dnNt6 =v5bv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC5E43248A711064666F0410D--
文章代碼(AID): #1G3I3UWy (FB_current)
文章代碼(AID): #1G3I3UWy (FB_current)