Re: [CFT] Add -Wbounded to gcc

=0A--- Mer 11/7/12, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> ha scritto:=0A...=0A> =
=0A> Does it catch any really interesting bound overruns?=0A> =0A=0ANah .. =
I arrived to the conclusion that it's not=0Areally worth it :).=0A=0A> If t=
he number of false positives is very large, then it=0A> generally isn't=0A>=
 worth the pain.=A0 Or the option should be turned off by=0A> default, and =
only=0A> enabled for WARNS=3Dsome_arbitrary_high_number.=0A> =0A=0AIt is ni=
ce to have but I don't think we should turn it on=0Afor any level. I will h=
ave to look at how to do that.=0A=0AThanks,=0A=0APedro.=0A 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"