Re: Why NOT using FreeBSD? Re: ports/169581: editors/libreoffice


Just IMHO;=0A=0A--- Mer 4/7/12, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> ha scritto:=
=0A...=0A> >>=0A> >> This is not what I expect from quality securing! It=0A=
> >> is simply a mess and definitely another reason=0A> >> and point for th=
e thread "Why NOT using FreeBSD".=0A> >=0A> > sure libreoffice is so easy t=
o port...=0A> > =0A> > /me officially gives up with that libreoffice port,=
=0A> > open for new volunteers =0A> =0A> If you don't have time to work on =
the port, then don't,=0A> that's not a problem. But throwing a hissy fit he=
re=0A> doesn't help at all.=0A=0AEven on paid jobs, people always have the =
right to quit.=0A=0AThe thing, as I see it, is that people have to understa=
nd=0Athis is a volunteer project and if people don't do things=0Aby themsel=
ves they really can't demand someone else to=0Ado it for them.=0A=0A=0A> It=
's a plain fact that a working office suite is a basic=0A> requirement for =
most desktop users. If _we_ can't provide=0A> that (note, not you, personal=
ly, we, as a=0A> project), it's a valid reason for users to avoid FreeBSD f=
or=0A> desktop use.=0A> =0A=0AThe system is as strong as it's weakest link.=
 There=0Aare perfectly good office suites for FreeBSD and even=0Athen for s=
ome of us that is not enough to use FreeBSD=0A(or linux) as a desktop.=0A=
=0A> If we're ever going to make progress in this area we=0A> have to be wi=
lling to examine and absorb facts; and=0A> then act accordingly.=0A>=0A=0AI=
f people think a particular office suite is critical=0Athen *they* have to =
spend time on it. If no one has=0Athe time or skills then maybe it's not th=
at important=0Aat all.=0A=0A=0APedro.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"