Re: FYI: SIGBUS with world built by clang
--udoRqEMdU50CdIRN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:08:30 +0200
> Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> > On 2012-07-04 16:33, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
> > > For people having SIGBUS with clang-build world + gcc-build binaries,
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > In short words, for any libraries (and never forget about rtld-elf!)
> > > which are potentially called from arbitrary binaries,
> > > compile them with either -mstackrealign or -mstack-alignment=3D8!
> > >=20
> > > The detail is as follows.
> > >=20
> > > I've observed that clang carelessly expects the stack being aligned at
> > > 16 byte boundary.
> >=20
> > Eh, this is a requirement of the amd64 ABI. Any compiler that *doesn't*
> > align the stack on 16-byte boundaries is basically broken. Or are you
> > experiencing this on i386? Even there, 16-byte alignment would be much
> > better in combination with SSE instructions (which arent' enabled by
> > default, btw).
>=20
> Oops, I had to be clear about that!
> Yes, the experiment was took on i386 (actually -march=3Dpentium4).
>=20
> > Note that you would get the same issue with newer versions of gcc, which
> > will also assume this alignment.
>=20
> Interesting, but the base gcc we currently have won't on i386, I think.
> (I occationally get bitten by similar problem when using -ftree-vectorize)
As far as I understand the rules, $esp % 16 must be zero before call
instruction is executed.
i386 csu explicitely aligns the stack before calling into C land, everything
else should be the C compiler own offence :).
--udoRqEMdU50CdIRN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk/0siUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g32QCff5GaW0Rvk4uuUiNlh++/kj6Y
oD0An2u8FqC6zVpCdMHi/gwE069pgNGj
=Q70s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--udoRqEMdU50CdIRN--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 7 篇)：