Re: Customizing ubldr build...
On May 24, 2012, at 1:16 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
> On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>=20
>> I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot,
>> so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot
>> chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone.
>=20
> What are the benefits of using ubldr compared to what we are doing =
today(load; go)?
For a fully custom closed embedded system, nothing.
But as we move towards more generic kernels that support more
environments, ubldr has the ability to:
* Load the kernel from UFS (which in turn means that end users can use =
buildkernel/installkernel to update the kernel)
* Load the device tree separately from the kernel.
* Interactively edit the device tree
* Preload specific modules
* Script the boot process (the i386 interactive boot menu is a Forth =
script that runs on the stock loader; ubldr has the same ability)
Tim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 13 之 13 篇):