Re: panic: incorrect npmc count

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/06/03 18:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/3 (看更多)
--Apple-Mail=_4EE97FF8-E5B3-43F3-960A-7DAA9D7602A3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Le 9 mai 2012 =E0 16:30, Ryan Stone a =E9crit : > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> = wrote: >> [This may be a duplicate because I forgot to update my subscription >> after changing address but I've also corrected a typo] >>=20 >> (I've copied fabient@ because r233628 appears to have been the last >> commit in this area). >>=20 >> I've just updated a P4 test box from r232545 to r235127 and it now >> panics during boot: >> panic: [intel,202] incorrect npmc count 35 >> Looking at sys/dev/hwpmc/hmpmc_intel.c line 202, the expected >> npmc count is 19. >>=20 >> When I look at the actual code in pmc_intel_initialize(): >> pmc_mdep_alloc() initialises pmd_npmc to zero and then increments >> it by SOFT_NPMCS (16) in pmc_soft_initialize(). >> pmc_tsc_initialize() then increments it by TSC_NPMCS (1) >> pmc_p4_initialize() then increments it by P4_NPMCS (18) >> This totals 35 (as per the panic message). >>=20 >> Can someone explain the KASSERT() that expects 19 - it boils down to >> KASSERT(0+16+1+18 =3D=3D 1+18, ...) >> I gather not many people are running -current on a P4. >>=20 >> -- >> Peter Jeremy >=20 > That KASSERT is just out of date. The soft PMC support is quite new. > I would just drop the KASSERT entirely; it really isn't adding any > value. Back from vacation. Yes, as Ryan stated the KASSERT is out of date and i've missed the update / removal with soft PMC. Fixed with r235229. Fabien --Apple-Mail=_4EE97FF8-E5B3-43F3-960A-7DAA9D7602A3--
文章代碼(AID): #1Fopqhzg (FB_current)
文章代碼(AID): #1Fopqhzg (FB_current)