Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:09:48PM +0200, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wro=
te:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:59:15AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >> Daniel Nebdal writes:
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0In the case of gcc46, when I execute the previou=
s six lines,
> >> > =A0> return to
> >> > =A0> /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-=
core-3.5.2.2,
> >> > =A0> and run "make", I get:
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0it says:
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> Error expanding embedded variable.
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(Per a previous message, I have re-compiled libc=
mis with
> >> > =A0> gcc42.)
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Any ideas?
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0>
> >> > =A0> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0=
Robert Huff
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > =A0Try with gmake instead?
> >>
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 After fishing in different directoroes, I did so and got:
> >>
> >> Entering /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffic=
e-core-3.5.2.2/sal/textenc
> >>
> >> Entering /data/port-work/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffic=
e-core-3.5.2.2/sal/util
> >>
> >> Making: =A0 =A0libuno_sal.so.3
> >> : ERROR: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.15 required by .=
=2E/unxfbsd.pro/lib/check_libuno_sal.so.3 not found
> >> dmake: =A0Error code 1, while making '../unxfbsd.pro/lib/libuno_sal.so=
=2E3'
> >>
> >>
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =
=A0 =A0 Robert Huff
> >>
> >
> > That was the problem I was speaking about mixing different libstdc++ th=
e one
> > from base and the one from gcc46.
> >
> > I don't know how to fix this.
> >
> > regards,
> > Bapt
>=20
>=20
> Does this also happen when building libreoffice with clang? I just
> built it on 8.2 using clang, and that worked fine (apart from a
> failure in vcl, but that was caused by some leftover qt3 headers in
> /usr/local/include ).
>=20
>=20
> Daniel Nebdal
With clang it is ok
Bapt
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk+qfokACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwMpwCgn1DzstnQXpSHpnjBwgidUnon
T9AAmwdxwynsgdY7Cn8zbnauWLwQof5c
=QSn6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 29 之 31 篇)：