Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/05/02 10:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/9 (看更多)
Wiadomo=B6=E6 napisana przez Adrian Chadd w dniu 17 kwi 2012, o godz. = 21:17: > On 16 April 2012 23:31, Richard Kojedzinszky <krichy@tvnetwork.hu> = wrote: >>=20 >> So now reactions here, creating files with multilabel is still slow. >>=20 >> I would like to use multilabel access control on my /tmp, for = example, my >> web server places it's session files there in a subdirectory. Of = course, I >> would like to assign a label for that subdir, but with this slow file >> creation, that is not the way to go. I may then use a different = filesystem >> for that. In this case, can I assign a root mac label for a mount = point? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > This is a perfect job for hwpmc / dtrace. >=20 > Would you be able to load up either of those and get some CPU usage > statistics whilst you're running your benchmark? >=20 > It's either that, or it's (massive) locking contention. Or disk I/O. MAC labels, just like ACLs, are stored in extended = attributes, and I remember something about writing those being synchronous. --=20 If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my = body? _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1Fe9LpXW (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Fe9LpXW (FB_current)