Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2012/03/22 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串25/25 (看更多)
--D6z0c4W1rkZNF4Vu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 05:18:07PM +0200, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > when a package can be installed in both i386 and amd64 > >=20 > > and maybe in the Makefile: > >=20 > > PKGARCH=3D i386 amd64 > >=20 > > or > >=20 > > PKGARCH=3D x86:32 x86:64 >=20 > Baptiste, if ABI/arch ids will leak out to port Makefiles (i.e. I will > need to care about them), then please leave them matching to the usual > FreeBSD arch names, i.e. i386 and amd64, not the new ones. For reasons > of consistency. The is the reason of the "or" :) the problem will occurs with the old way when arm and mips package support will be generalized regards, Bapt --D6z0c4W1rkZNF4Vu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk9qECEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez9dgCZAYhSIfZv3DYRiku08r7Ghr3w /1oAn1I9SnYgiKhpRbIv7/JVD8hVOYty =Akaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D6z0c4W1rkZNF4Vu--
文章代碼(AID): #1FQXTaCb (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FQXTaCb (FB_current)