Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2012/03/20 19:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串13/25 (看更多)
IMHO, 32 / 64 = easily parsable and represent integer. i386/amd64 - wellknown names, but this info about processor bits not lies in math. My point is i386 is arch, so can be kept, while 32 is processor bit count. If you'll keep 32/64 various checks in side software will be simple (if you have 32 bit processor, then this info is bundled in "32"), while if you consider using "i386" string as storage of information about "32" bit, it not so elegant. Also, linuxes has come to i386- i586- i686- mess, and many their scripts looks overbloated when they checks if system really 32 bit. Just my point of view :) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1FQ6DkBe (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FQ6DkBe (FB_current)