Re: SCHED_ULE / NetGraph interaction broken somwhere between


Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 12 =FF=ED=E2=E0=F0=FF 2012 =E3., 14:29:57:

> Well, I mostly meant things like uptime, load level and pattern, etc.
  These are identical too -- freshly boot system, same load (torrent
 client on other box), only load -- traffic, as it is router, same
 upload/download speeds and peer counts in torrent client.

> But what mav says makes sense.
  I'm rebuilding system with ULE and KSTACK_PAGES=3D6 (3 is default on i386)
 now.

> Also I remember seeing some very old reports about some strange issues wi=
th
> SCHED_ULE and dummynet.
> Some links that I found:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/046332.html
> http://dadv.livejournal.com/139366.html#cutid1

> Given the last link, I wonder if binding the ng_queue thread to a particu=
lar CPU
> would change anything.
  It is AMD Geode 500MHz. There is no ``particular CPU,'' there is only
The CPU with The Core :)

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"