Re: SU+J systems do not fsck themselves

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/12/29 03:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串12/16 (看更多)
--EURhva3SXbTcVq/V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:14:19AM -0800, mdf@freebsd.org wrote: > SU doesn't care about write ordering, as long as everything before a > BIO_FLUSH is really flushed by the time the BIO_FLUSH is acknowledged. No. SU and SU+J only require that write completed notification is issued when geom/driver layer guarantees that the block content is written to the stable storage. SU does not depend on non-reordering of writes in any way, as well as it does not issue BIO_FLUSH. --EURhva3SXbTcVq/V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk77a1MACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hK+QCgjOV68X27ufdcR9iEQ3HTW3Sd HnAAn3PhjvVYKJpoGGulkvS/zYgzxz0H =RBAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EURhva3SXbTcVq/V--
文章代碼(AID): #1E-swpt0 (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1E-swpt0 (FB_current)