Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig39A77F392D735EB75795DD67
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/16/11 07:44, Joe Holden wrote:
> Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
>> <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTAyNzA
>>>
>> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is=
>> using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to
>> out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-)
>>
> serenity# gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]
>=20
> serenity# uname -r
> 9.0-RC3
>=20
For the underlying OS, as far as I know, the compiler hasn't as much
impact as on userland software since autovectorization and other neat
things are not used during system build.
=46rom my experience using gcc 4.2 or 4.4/4.5 does not have an impact
beyond 3% when SSE isn't explicetly enforced.
More interesting is the performance gain due to the architecture. I
think it would be very easy for M. Larabel to repeat this benchmark with
a "bleeding edge" Ubuntu or Suse as well. And since FreeBSD 9.0 can be
compiled with CLANG, it should be possible to compare both also with
"bleeding edge" compilers, say FreeBSD 9/CLANG, Ubuntu 12/gcc 4.6.2.
>> Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of=
>> people are still in abnegation...
>>
>> my 0.2c,
>> - Arnaud
>>
>>> It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts =
of
>>> the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyon=
d
>>> disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading those
>>> benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as a back=
end
>>> server in scientific and business environments. In detail, some of th=
e
>>> SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image can't help over=
>>> the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing.
>>>
>>> From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than=
10
>>> - 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times.
>>>
>>> I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur
>>> spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oliver
--------------enig39A77F392D735EB75795DD67
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6u3hAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8TCsH/1Aqj3f2K3XC7u6sDI8GlXn6
OK0v5A6UrlGHHWGz6mrJ60EeH8406T/e2eA1E0iRJotQwGdr0Rvpcm+J0bxcqom8
uBVJ/yXLFyiGT3GZR7t27/wrTRXRV9yYlxqaYs9zvTf2e9rUO4ttqx69yNV5SuSI
9wzkqqA8AmctorRrpyj2wVt0iNUFzFFPSBz/REj9vJOjdFPGdqWJwKUVDeEBQrny
q/4lZjhmNX5qeeC2/enceYRgN3FjeYjSqHJ2JHw7qKPnYWYF3r7/J7A0A/es2G6b
KQjBTs5xfUvnVwyu2gCQoFpNQ92S5kiq6KDZs+RQ6jaQUxBrEwdWHruOGLj2OIg=
=+AbL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig39A77F392D735EB75795DD67--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇)：