Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/12/06 06:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串21/28 (看更多)
on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following: > On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are not >> normally busy; the correct explanation is quite a bit longer than this, the >> comment in the code explains VPO_BUSY as "page is in transit". Right now this >> flag doesn't seem tom affect vboxdrv code but it may lead to surprises when some >> parts of code that are incorrect now are re-implemented properly: >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.emulation/9297 > > VM_ALLOC_NOOBJ implies that the returned page does not have VPO_BUSY set. From > the comment at the head of both vm_page_alloc() and vm_page_alloc_contig(): > > * VM_ALLOC_NOOBJ page is not associated with an object and > * should not have the flag VPO_BUSY set Ah, oops, forgot about this. > With regard to the message that the above link points to, I suspect that the > introduction of vm_page_alloc_contig() can be used to address the first problem > that you point out. Specifically, one or more OBJT_PHYS vm objects could be > created and passed to vm_map_find() and then vm_page_alloc_contig() could be > used to fill these vm objects with memory. That's exactly what I was trying to do when I encountered a need for VM_ALLOC_NOOBJ - my object was not NULL. Alan, BTW, is it safe to map an OBJT_PHYS object into the kernel_map and into a user map (or a few of them) at the same time? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EtKPZf3 (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 21 之 28 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1EtKPZf3 (FB_current)