Re: /usr/home vs /home

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/11/24 20:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/8 (看更多)
On 22 November 2011 13:36, C. P. Ghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, <"Thomas Mueller > <mueller6727"@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > But I don't see any advantage to putting /, /usr, and /var on separate > partitions. > > > > Tom > > Regarding separate /usr and /var: the advantage is that you can > keep /usr read-only which is also important for security reasons > since modifying system binaries becomes less easy. > > Furthermore, you can NFS share a read-only /usr among many > similar machines, while /var is a per-machine specific read-write > area. > > -cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I always have /var and /tmp on separate file systems than /, but dont normally have a separate /usr, bur I have a /usr/local. I like to keep the /var and /tmp fs separate as they as other are mentioned. Therefore they are more prone to corruption in event of the power failure. Keeping / separate in this case should make the system more likely to reboot. Also it stops application filling up / which can stop you logging into the system (I havent seen this issue for year admittedly) /usr/local is just for tidyness as it keeps base os separate from ports etc I also have /home on a separate as well to stops users filling up root as well. my zfsroot boxes have this setup as well, but i also add a few reservations and quotas. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EpZb2iw (FB_current)
文章代碼(AID): #1EpZb2iw (FB_current)