Re: Patch for ports on 10-current

On 10/10/2011 15:00, Nali Toja wrote:
> Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> 
>> Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
>> that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
>> that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
>> tools to work with:
>>
>> http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
> [...]
>> +.if ${OSVERSION} >= 1000000 && !defined(NO_LIBTOOL_FIXED)
> 
> The issue does not lie in OSVERSION but in OSREL. So, why not be smarter
> and detect if a user has UNAME_r workaround in environment 

Because by doing it the way I did it the user can apply both fixes, or
either fix individually by using the right combination of knobs.

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"