MBR, GPT and their co-existence with other GEOM classes

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/09 15:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
Hello, Perryh. You wrote 9 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 18:00:02: > To install FreeBSD on a gmirrored disk, use MBR (or "dangerously > dedicated" BSD label) instead of GPT. (This is one reason why > BSD label and MBR should not be considered obsolete.) MBR doesn't check size of provider on taste. It should be fixed too. So, I see three changes which should be done in geom_gpart land: (1) GPT sub-moudle gpart should check rank of provider and issue big warning if rank isn't 1 (it is not low-level disk) on creation. (2) Documentation should be changed to explain (1) in more details. (3) MBR sub-module of gpart should check size of provider and refuse to "see" MBR if provider is several sectors larger, than recorded in MBR. It will prevent it to pickup failed component of gmirror directly. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EaKtoRo (FB_current)
文章代碼(AID): #1EaKtoRo (FB_current)