Re: Memstick image differences between 8.x and 9.x

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/09 02:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/25 (看更多)
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Thomas K. <fwd@gothschlampen.com> wrote: > Hello, > > a while ago I downloaded a then current FreeBSD 9 current memstick image and > wrote it to an USB pen drive. It didn't boot, but also showed no error. > It just did not appear in the list of devices to boot from, after pressing > F12 after POST on this box. > > I thought maybe the pen drive was bad or unbootable or something, and forgot > about it. This was for playing around with ZFS, so I went with FreeBSD 8.1 > back then. No problems. > > With FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 I tried again on another pen drive (known to work ok), > same result. It just does not appear in the list of devices to boot from > when pressing F12 after POST. > > Are there any general structural differences between FreeBSD 8 and 9 memstick > images which could be at fault here? > > I didn't really investigate this issue any further than described, just being > curious. The new memstick image uses GPT instead of MBR partitioning. -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1Ea9SYam (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Ea9SYam (FB_current)