Re: RFC: Project geom-events

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/08 04:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串42/52 (看更多)
On 07.10.11 22:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Perryh. > You wrote 7 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 18:06:38: > >>> GPT (and MBR) metadata placement is dictated from outside world, >>> where is no GEOM and geom_label. They INTENDED to be used on DISKS. >>> BIOSes should be able to find it :) >> Certainly GPT and MBR must place an instance of the partition table >> where the BIOS expects it, but there's no immediately obvious reason >> why they must regard that instance as their GEOM metadata. GPT puts >> a second copy in the provider's last block, and AFAICT it could just >> as well use _that_ instance -- or even a differently-formatted block >> that included the same data -- as the primary. MBR could do likewise.= > I have deja-vu, that I answered this. Please, read standard. GPT > _must_ be placed twice -- at first and last sectors (really, more > than one sectors). By standard. Secondary copy must be at end of > disk. Period. > Then, "by standard" GPT cannot coexist with GLABEL. Such setup should be = disallowed, or at least big nasty message that you have just shoot=20 yourself in the leg should be output. (period) Daniel _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EZs73gS (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EZs73gS (FB_current)