Re: RFC: Project geom-events

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/10/08 04:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串41/52 (看更多)
Hello, Perryh. You wrote 7 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 18:06:38: >> GPT (and MBR) metadata placement is dictated from outside world, >> where is no GEOM and geom_label. They INTENDED to be used on DISKS. >> BIOSes should be able to find it :) > Certainly GPT and MBR must place an instance of the partition table > where the BIOS expects it, but there's no immediately obvious reason > why they must regard that instance as their GEOM metadata. GPT puts > a second copy in the provider's last block, and AFAICT it could just > as well use _that_ instance -- or even a differently-formatted block > that included the same data -- as the primary. MBR could do likewise. I have deja-vu, that I answered this. Please, read standard. GPT _must_ be placed twice -- at first and last sectors (really, more than one sectors). By standard. Secondary copy must be at end of disk. Period. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EZrg0-O (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EZrg0-O (FB_current)