Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT


On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Matt wrote:

> On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>>>> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
>>>> Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess =
they
>>>> got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from
>>>> portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I =
checked!
>>>>=20
>>>> This is a catastrophy ...
>>>>=20
>>>> I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844
>>> It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh
>>> ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after
>>> 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't =
understand
>>> the 2-digit release version.
>>>=20
>>> Solutions are to set UNAME_r=3D9.0-CURRENT in your environment, =
and/or
>>> twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> hth,
>>>=20
>>> Doug
>>>=20
>> Yes, it has been discussed. But I was too dumb to realise that the
>> phenomenon I
>> experienced was triggered by this.
>> I'll stay tuned and watch when a solution is at hand.
>>=20
> I also was apparently too dumb! Making progress with UNAME_r and =
newvers.sh as we speak.
> I was unable to compile neon29 properly with UNAME_r alone... =
buildkernel underway.
> At least it's never boring!

	Please be aware that some user apps like net-smp and kernel =
modules like nvidia-driver key in on the __FreeBSD_version number. So if =
it's out of sync with reality, bad things can happen as you're breaking =
some developers' assumptions.
Thanks!
-Garrett=
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"