Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
>> >Kevin Oberman<kob6558@gmail.com> =A0writes:
>> >
>> >>On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett<ade@freebsd.org> =A0wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to =
be
>> >>>expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
>> >>>
>> >>>The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completel=
y
>> >>>at random) assuming that FreeBSD would never jump to a double-digit
>> >>>major version number, and as such, various regexps for "freebsd1*" (i=
e:
>> >>>FreeBSD 1.1.x) are now matching "freebsd10".
>> >[...]
>> >>
>> >>aDe,
>> >>
>> >>Could an entry to this effect be added to UPDATING (with a matching
>> >>entry when ports/ is "unbroken").
>> >
>> >Also mention a workaround, e.g.
>> >
>> > =A0 $ export UNAME_r=3D'9.9-BLAH'
>>
>>
>> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for
>> their tenth version of their operating system ...
>
> At least there will be a long rest after
> the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 100.
>

I'm afraid not;

freebsd2*)

We'll be just as screwed at 20.

Hopefully we can fix that at the same time.

Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"