Re: Trying to install current from a memory stick and then a DVD
Quoting Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 25/07/2011 07:47 Warren Block said the following:
>>> 2. The options don't always really apply. Create when ad0 is =20
>>> highlighted leads
>>> the user to think they can create a new device, like ad1. But it =20
>>> will really
>>> create another partition. Delete on ad0 deletes all the =20
>>> partitions, not ad0.
>>> No warning, either.
>>
>> Are you sure about this one?
>> I have never expected that any installer would be able to create or delet=
e
>> hardware (a hard disk) in my computer.
>
> "Device" as in entry in /dev.
>
> It's a little blurrier than that. With no partitioning scheme, =20
> Create makes one, having the user select the type. After that, it =20
> creates new partitions.
>
> Having messed with this editor more, I can make it work and see the =20
> intent of the user interface. I wish I could suggest a good way to =20
> make it more clear, but can't quite get my brain around it right now.
That makes two of us right now. I gave up, accepted the automatic =20
partition and everything else went as expected, I suppose. The disk =20
results are:
# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ada0p2 941441086 2150880 863974920 0% /
devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev
In my world from the beginning of commercial unix, I have never had a =20
one partition disk. I'm not sure if it is that bad with today's, =20
controllers, drives, drivers, etc. I hope someone chimes in with a "I =20
see no major problems with gpt."
My major problem was editing the automatic swap that was set at 4G and =20
the menu would not let me change the 4G. The experienced option would =20
not accept a blank value as swap even though there was message that =20
said it would.
I feel like a real idiot and am beginning to believe that it might be true.
The rest of the install was brain dead. It was possibly a bit simpler =20
than the previous. Less decisions ;)
I had the idea the following were available in the new installer.
1. Raid configuration
2. ZFS
3. Regular everyday simple disk partitioning as before.
I wasn't able to find any functional option except the one mentioned above.
Now, I have to accept this single partition or upgrade sources to =20
date, build a release and reinstall but I don't know if the problem =20
has been fixed. I'll probably give it a try. It isn't that much of a =20
deal.
Thanks,
ed
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 25 之 29 篇):