Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable?

看板FB_chat作者時間11年前 (2014/03/20 05:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com> writes: >> From: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com >> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300 >> >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this >> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s, >> etc. " >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > > because no one responds? I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer. I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, although maybe not quite as strongly. _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1JAWMERa (FB_chat)
文章代碼(AID): #1JAWMERa (FB_chat)