Re: What is this forum for?
--Sig_/56DgJ4JSYfQuNE=ufhuMKlm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:09:04 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
[ .. ]
> > dealing with humans) is a very unfair tactic in trying to justify
> > any view.
> > What you want to look for is a solution that causes the least
> > problems, and respecting the list rules does that.
>=20
> Where are this rules defined?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/etique=
tte.html
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/
> best with moderation BUT EVEN WITHOUT, but with clearly defined rules
> on webpage it could be efficient.
Let's make a test case: please compare your emails with the rules and
suggestions in above two articles.
We spend a few hours per day *working* on improving FreeBSD, doing also
moderating is just to much.
Besides, we expect people to behave intelligently and politely. Life
keeps contradicting us it seems :-[
> the more clear - the more efficient. possibly some most-common
> examples to make it even clearer.
>=20
> > It won't fix all problems, but it does
> > keep the noise level on our lists to a minimum, and maximizes the
> > amount of help that can be passed on our lists.
>=20
> Help at all or help about FreeBSD. if at all - then let it be about=20
> everything.
>=20
> >> Another question - some of you said that "outdated" hardware is
> >> welcome too as gifts for FreeBSD team.
> >>
> >> I actually have lots of them, and NON-typical things, that would be
> >> useful. I prepared a list, and can make photos.
> >>
> >> I already sent a mail to one developer but got no response. Maybe
> >> he is just busy or absent, anyway what's the best address for this.
Please contact donations@
> just got this after a day:
>=20
> ---
> Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 23:47:08 +0400
> From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
> Subject: Re: sponsoring
>=20
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:43 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>=20
> > you said that "outdated hardware" are very welcome.
>=20
> No, I had never said it. Please, stop spamming me.
>=20
>=20
> ---
>=20
>=20
> OK so fuck off Boris, but we were talking some time ago about dumping=20
> potential sponsors ;)
Watch you language please.
> anyone want to see my mail(s) it was a reply to?
No. Really not. Given the way you behaved in this thread you're one
step away from my killfile.
Maybe you should take a few days and think if all the people
disagreeing here with you are wrong.
--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
--Sig_/56DgJ4JSYfQuNE=ufhuMKlm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkoiu0kACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeX8UwCfbst98wcukbzRT8wbu0376V27
7UkAnjqyg+glxZ7jTSDyn972LaWN56IO
=2Qwa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/56DgJ4JSYfQuNE=ufhuMKlm--
討論串 (同標題文章)