Re: groff alternative?

看板FB_chat作者時間20年前 (2005/06/21 02:45), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
In message: <20050617221313.GV18614@philemon.caltech.edu> Paul Allen <pallen@donut.ugcs.caltech.edu> writes: : (reply-to set to freebsd-chat, this discussion doesn't : The BSD license reads: : : 1) this code is released into the public domain : 2) this code may not be taken out of the public domain : (vacuous duplication of #1) : 3) during redistribution you may not conceal that this code is : in the public domain (vacuous duplication of #2) : 4) I declare my opinion that I am not offering something : which induces liability on myself. (vacuous duplication of : #1) Actually, The BSD license most certainly does not say that. It says that you can distribute however you want, so long as credit is given. The old BSD license adds additional responisbilities such as including information in your advertising, and a non-endorcement clause. The copyright, and therefore the right to license under a different license, remains with the original author. Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #12jmxR00 (FB_chat)
文章代碼(AID): #12jmxR00 (FB_chat)