Re: Help:why there is no distribution based on FreeBSD?
--vni90+aGYgRvsTuO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Friday, 5 November 2004 at 15:11:23 +0800, wen heping wrote:
> There are so many Linux distribution such as RedHat SUSE Mandrake and
> ....,while it seems that there is no other distribution based on FreeBSD.
> Who can tell me why?
Because it's not necessary?
As others have said, Linux is a kernel. To make it useful, people had
to package the rest of the system around it. The result is a
"distribution" of the Linux kernel.
FreeBSD has always been a complete system, so it doesn't need this
kind of workaround. As somebody said, that doesn't stop people from
trying.
Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
--vni90+aGYgRvsTuO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBjTQpIubykFB6QiMRAlvGAJ0cdEPD7dWOd7dJQ54ohdXMU1bOJQCfaAMG
a+EI8chVcn+VAfaSnuwJiFc=
=cKCI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vni90+aGYgRvsTuO--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇)：