--0k24IdCjZr+ZpLJG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thursday, 19 August 2004 at 20:04:57 -0500, Brian Sobolak wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Friday, 20 August 2004 at 0:57:26 +0100, John Murphy wrote:
>
>>> Never used Outlook or Outlook Express myself but I get the
>>> impression that what they see is NOT what they send.
>>
>>
>> I used to think that too, for the obvious reason that you can't
>> understand why anybody would send such a broken message. Since then,
>> I've come to the realization that yes, indeed, a very large number of
>> people *do* send obviously broken text. The main reason seems to be
>> that it's just too difficult to get right.
>
> This is totally true. Outlook on the PC absolutely can't deal with line
> breaks appropriately. It was the single most frustrating thing about it.
>
> That was, of course, until I had to use Lotus Notes as my MUA again.
> Makes Outlook appear like a dream.
Heh. Been there, done that.
> And again I'll say: anything Outlook does poorly, Lotus can do
> worse. You'd struggle to find a worse MUA.
Agreed.
Greg
--
Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen.
Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
--0k24IdCjZr+ZpLJG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBJU8yIubykFB6QiMRAj1cAJ9ZFFyZMq8vjvaNiP3dTV9T3/XNUgCfdtQ0
S1eiAt6bkdR+ym61wnG51T0=
=Hbcp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0k24IdCjZr+ZpLJG--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：