[請益] 103年台大民訴（薏偉解題）
請問一下
原告對保證人起訴履行保證債務
被告即保證人主張 原告對主債務人不負價金義務
且保證契約是被脅迫做成
法院認為原告對主債務人債權不存在而認原告對保證人訴訟敗訴
問原告對保證人判決之既判力或拘束力是否及於主債務人
為何作者在這題解題會認為
因為有經過原告跟保證人認真攻防法院實質審理
縱然在前訴訟沒有職權通知主債務人
縱然在前訴訟沒有職權通知主債務人
前訴訟判決效力也會及於主債務人
先不要說邱派向來都認為要給程序參與或是參與機會才能擴張
就連這提前後擬答也矛盾
請問一下是我哪邊理解錯誤嗎
謝謝
[請益] 應考資格、各種國考疑難雜症等，以有正確作法、答案者為主
(不包括書裡的疑問)。若問題如人生規劃、讀書計畫等，無一
定作法、答案者，請用閒聊選項。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.76.203.123
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1504674949.A.61B.html
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1504674949.A.61B.html
※ 編輯: clarinaser (42.76.203.123), 09/06/2017 13:17:04
推
09/06 13:20, , 1F
09/06 13:20, 1F
→
09/06 13:23, , 2F
09/06 13:23, 2F
→
09/06 13:24, , 3F
09/06 13:24, 3F
→
09/06 13:24, , 4F
09/06 13:24, 4F
推
09/06 13:27, , 5F
09/06 13:27, 5F
→
09/06 13:27, , 6F
09/06 13:27, 6F
→
09/06 13:28, , 7F
09/06 13:28, 7F
→
09/06 13:30, , 8F
09/06 13:30, 8F
→
09/06 13:30, , 9F
09/06 13:30, 9F
→
09/06 13:31, , 10F
09/06 13:31, 10F
推
09/06 14:40, , 11F
09/06 14:40, 11F
→
09/06 14:41, , 12F
09/06 14:41, 12F
→
09/06 14:41, , 13F
09/06 14:41, 13F
→
09/06 15:40, , 14F
09/06 15:40, 14F
推
09/06 15:52, , 15F
09/06 15:52, 15F
→
09/06 15:52, , 16F
09/06 15:52, 16F
推
09/06 16:00, , 17F
09/06 16:00, 17F
→
09/06 16:00, , 18F
09/06 16:00, 18F
→
09/06 16:00, , 19F
09/06 16:00, 19F
→
09/06 16:00, , 20F
09/06 16:00, 20F
→
09/06 16:00, , 21F
09/06 16:00, 21F
→
09/06 16:00, , 22F
09/06 16:00, 22F
→
09/06 16:00, , 23F
09/06 16:00, 23F
→
09/06 16:00, , 24F
09/06 16:00, 24F
→
09/06 16:01, , 25F
09/06 16:01, 25F
→
09/06 16:01, , 26F
09/06 16:01, 26F
推
09/06 16:25, , 27F
09/06 16:25, 27F
→
09/06 16:25, , 28F
09/06 16:25, 28F