Re: [Talk] Asia...CNN
I think fluency is more significant,cause the first function of a
language is to communicate with each other rather than to show his voice.
As an anchor,he should make his audience understood what he said,
but perhaps,all of the anchors or reporters are influenced by their
circumstance where they grow.
※ 引述《sunstone (dale)》之銘言：
: Though knowing there is a programme on CNN named "talk Asia",
: I rarely have time to enjoy it. What is it about, Asian celebs?
: Some people said anchors, or reporters on CNN have special
: accents; however, as far as I am concered, the tapes downloaded from BBC
: are much harder to understand, in which people speak with heavy accents;
: nevertheless, we are supposed to make sense of all kinds of accents now
: that we have decided to pick up this language.
: To some people, acquiring a nativelike accent is important, while to others,
: speaking as fluently as natives is even more important.
: Which is right...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.99.222.55
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 5 篇)：