[請益] 一段文章看不太懂

看板Eng-Class作者 (herrlinks)時間7年前 (2018/09/17 19:43), 7年前編輯推噓4(4推 0噓 14→)
留言18則, 4人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
各位先進晚安 小弟最近看一篇文章，有一段看不太懂想請教版上高手 Dolan also spoke about queer representation, specifically how social media has helped actors and actresses come out. That's something that wasn't mainstream when he first began writing "The Death and Life of John F. Donovan," he pointed out. However, he added, that doesn't mean Hollywood has changed in how it accepts them. Although these actors are able to fully embrace their identity, Dolan said they might not be able to pursue the same opportunities they would have if they hadn't come out. There's still work that needs to be done, he said. 我認為這句意思是說＂如果他們不表示自己的性向就無法得到演出的機會＂ 但是我在網路上有找到一篇中譯文章卻是說＂他們可能會因為出櫃， 而失去原本擁有的演出機會＂ 因為跟我的認為的意思有很大的出入所以想請教大家的看法。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.49.202 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1537184594.A.CD9.html ※ 編輯: herrlinks (1.160.49.202), 09/17/2018 19:45:07
→
09/17 19:59, 7年前 , 1F
你理解錯誤
09/17 19:59, 1F
推
09/17 20:21, 7年前 , 2F
[the same opportunities ... come out] 像這樣加括號
09/17 20:21, 2F
→
09/17 20:21, 7年前 , 3F
再讀讀看
09/17 20:21, 3F
推
09/18 21:54, 7年前 , 4F
想問問看，這樣加括號只能靠經驗嗎?
09/18 21:54, 4F
→
09/18 21:56, 7年前 , 5F
因為這一次真的造成理解上的困擾了;
09/18 21:56, 5F
→
09/18 21:56, 7年前 , 6F
還是什麼地方有一堆範例可以背的...
09/18 21:56, 6F
→
09/18 21:57, 7年前 , 7F
好像用外國人的方式好像很喜歡用"同義詞"這種方式
09/18 21:57, 7F
→
09/19 08:19, 7年前 , 8F
這跟加不加括號沒什麼關係吧，重點是後面的 they "woul
09/19 08:19, 8F
→
09/19 08:19, 7年前 , 9F
d have" if they "hadn't come out"
09/19 08:19, 9F
推
09/19 13:43, 7年前 , 10F
加括號只是方便理解不是真的有一個括號在那 XD 因為我
09/19 13:43, 10F
→
09/19 13:43, 7年前 , 11F
猜會讀成原 po 那種意思括成 [they might ... would ha
09/19 13:43, 11F
→
09/19 13:43, 7年前 , 12F
ve] ，把整個看成後面 if 的主要子句
09/19 13:43, 12F
推
09/19 13:48, 7年前 , 13F
至於為何不能這樣我自己是覺得上下文很明顯就直接判定
09/19 13:48, 13F
→
09/19 13:48, 7年前 , 14F
，文法上的解釋麻煩高手們了 XD
09/19 13:48, 14F
→
09/19 19:16, 7年前 , 15F
they might not be able to pursue the same opportuni
09/19 19:16, 15F
→
09/19 19:16, 7年前 , 16F
ties.
09/19 19:16, 16F
→
09/19 19:18, 7年前 , 17F
they would have the same opportunities if they hadn
09/19 19:18, 17F
→
09/19 19:18, 7年前 , 18F
'nt come out. 請問我這樣理解對嗎?
09/19 19:18, 18F
‣ 更多 herrlinks 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1RdvDIpP (Eng-Class)