[文法] 此處是否應該要用whom?

看板Eng-Class作者 (水果店宅男)時間8年前 (2017/04/13 18:36), 8年前編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 7→)
留言7則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
想再請教各位高手一個英文文法問題 You need to be the kind of person who other people want to be stranded with on an uninhabited island 這句是從BBC上的文章截來,如果將這個句子拆開還原應為 1. You need to be the kind of person 2. Other people want to be stranded with the kind of person on an uninhabited island 第二句的kind of person應為受詞,那是否該用whom取代who: You need to be the kind of person whom other people want to be stranded with on an uninhabited island 實在是文法苦手,請各位高手指點一下^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 178.44.122.132 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1492079769.A.FAF.html
→
04/13 20:52, , 1F
是的，「應該」是whom，但是現在的英文用法是 who 有取代
04/13 20:52, 1F
→
04/13 20:53, , 2F
whom 的趨勢。另一個可能理由是單純的 typo，這可以由原
04/13 20:53, 2F
→
04/13 20:53, , 3F
文章它處的類似句子看出(或是他的其它文章)。如果原作者
04/13 20:53, 3F
→
04/13 20:53, , 4F
在它處也是用 who，那麼就是我前頭說的理由。如果在它處
04/13 20:53, 4F
→
04/13 20:53, , 5F
是用 whom ，那麼是typo。下次請直接給出處URL link。
04/13 20:53, 5F
感謝大大,URL在此~ https://goo.gl/3P2wuc p.3
→
04/13 21:11, , 6F
我看過一本文法書：who...to/whom...to/to whom 都可，但
04/13 21:11, 6F
→
04/13 21:11, , 7F
不能寫成 to who....
04/13 21:11, 7F
※ 編輯: carapple (62.212.73.141), 04/14/2017 16:12:47
‣ 更多 carapple 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1OxrIP-l (Eng-Class)