[求鞭] 想請版上前輩批判我的文章

看板Eng-Class作者htjnt0703 (常威)時間7年前 (2017/02/27 10:54)推噓3(3推 0噓 15→)

留言18則, 6人參與討論串1/1

各位好，因想練習作文無人可改，想請版上英文高手鞭我，下面是雅思的考題，想請問這樣大概的分數是？非常謝謝各位幫忙的前輩，感恩。題目：The government money should be invested in teaching science rather than other subjects so as to help a country make progress and develop. To what exte nt do you agree or disagree? 答案 The proverb says:” Science is the mother of technology”. Technology has been hugely and quickly developing since the 1990s. Every country wants to be a t e chnological leader . That requires many countries to invest a lot of money in science territory instead of other subjects. In my opinion, I disagree putting mostly sources in science rather than other subjects. First, putting most part of source into a single subject is wrong decision. Ta king history as a mirror. A country which makes people respect is not only by their technology or military force, but also by their soft power. For example, America is a standard example of the democratic countries in the world and is followed by some countries. Because America’s freedom of speech and democrat ic-politic system makes a lot people learn from it instead of just technology development. Second, There are many talent people specializing in different subjects. One i s interested in natural science. Another loves social science instead. If gove rnment puts almost money in science. It will give an implication that you have a more job opportunities if you major in science because our government just focus on technology development now. Maybe some of students who are not good a t science will be forced to choose the subject he really not interested. I can figure out why politicians always advocated putting part of educational budget on science. Perhaps technology will gives human progress and better lif e. However, we should not ignore other subject which bring mental satisfied to us. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 182.239.100.140 ※ 編輯: htjnt0703 (182.239.100.140), 02/27/2017 11:29:57 ※ 編輯: htjnt0703 (182.239.100.140), 02/27/2017 11:52:36

→

dunchee

02/27 11:53, , 1^F

02/27 11:53, 1^F

→

dunchee

02/27 11:53, , 2^F

02/27 11:53, 2^F

→

dunchee

02/27 11:53, , 3^F

02/27 11:53, 3^F