[文法] 請問兩句

看板Eng-Class作者 (我愛$$)時間9年前 (2017/01/12 18:57), 9年前編輯推噓0(0017)
留言17則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Saujani writes that the organization is more than a program,it's a movement. I asked them how different his life would have been had he been exposed to a group like XXX as a kid. 我想請問第一句that子句是副詞子句,但是it's a movement 好像多了一個be動詞請問有 解嗎. 另外第二句感覺也是多了 had he been...這個句子,請問是什麼文法 請問是因為省略其中的that嗎 感謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.12.66.192 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1484218630.A.A37.html ※ 編輯: teddyisgood (101.12.66.192), 01/12/2017 18:58:58

01/12 19:23, , 1F
一些寫得比較隨興的文章會出現這種兩個子句只以逗號
01/12 19:23, 1F

01/12 19:25, , 2F
連在一起所以不符文法 這裡也是 但補上連接詞(and)
01/12 19:25, 2F

01/12 19:26, , 3F
也不好(前後邏輯關係甚於"and") 可以逗號改成分號
01/12 19:26, 3F

01/12 19:26, , 4F
就好
01/12 19:26, 4F

01/12 19:27, , 5F
had he been = if he had been 與過去事實相反的假
01/12 19:27, 5F

01/12 19:27, , 6F
01/12 19:27, 6F

01/12 19:30, , 7F
不好意思 我知道had he been我是問多了had been 這
01/12 19:30, 7F

01/12 19:30, , 8F
個動詞是因為
01/12 19:30, 8F

01/12 19:31, , 9F
是因為省略I asked them (that)的that 嗎
01/12 19:31, 9F

01/12 19:39, , 10F
我看不出第二句有省略了什麼that耶@@
01/12 19:39, 10F

01/12 23:12, , 11F
字面上看確實是「憑空」多了動詞(had .. Vpp),也因此才
01/12 23:12, 11F

01/12 23:12, , 12F
說這是"if he had been"
01/12 23:12, 12F

01/12 23:13, , 13F
這是"固定/習慣用法",你要"想"/"理解"就只能從"if he
01/12 23:13, 13F

01/12 23:13, , 14F
had been"上去想(有if連接詞,所以有自己的子句動詞)
01/12 23:13, 14F

01/12 23:13, , 15F
這是特殊用法,是久遠之前保留/流傳下來的習慣用法,和你
01/12 23:13, 15F

01/12 23:13, , 16F
問的 that 無關
01/12 23:13, 16F

01/15 22:57, , 17F
感恩
01/15 22:57, 17F
文章代碼(AID): #1OTs46et (Eng-Class)