[文法] 看到分詞構句怎麼判斷是關係或對等子句

看板Eng-Class作者 (ggg)時間9年前 (2016/11/22 22:43), 9年前編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 16→)
留言16則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
請問, 看到分詞構句怎麼判斷是從關係或對等子句減化而來 The girl, playing the piano, did not know it. 1 The girl, who was playing the piano, did not know it. 2 Playing the piano, the girl did not know it. 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.187.98.130 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1479825833.A.1FB.html
→
11/22 22:56, , 1F
第二個句子怎麼樣都不會簡化成原PO問的那個句子吧
11/22 22:56, 1F
→
11/22 23:07, , 2F
第二個句子要變成分構也會是"The girl was playing
11/22 23:07, 2F
※ 編輯: snob2 (218.187.98.130), 11/22/2016 23:10:05
→
11/22 23:08, , 3F
the piano, not knowing it."
11/22 23:08, 3F
→
11/22 23:12, , 4F
你現在新改出來的這個句子跟原本的句子意思則不一樣
11/22 23:12, 4F
→
11/22 23:13, , 5F
因為通常把分構放在主句前，讀者會覺得有一個隱藏的
11/22 23:13, 5F
→
11/22 23:15, , 6F
連接詞，可能是解釋the girl did not know it的原因
11/22 23:15, 6F
→
11/22 23:15, , 7F
(像是because she was playing piano)
11/22 23:15, 7F
→
11/22 23:15, , 8F
，但原本的句子The girl, playing the piano, did
11/22 23:15, 8F
→
11/22 23:16, , 9F
not know it並不會給讀者這種理解。句子中那個分詞
11/22 23:16, 9F
→
11/22 23:17, , 10F
片語playing the piano就只是插在句子中表達
11/22 23:17, 10F
→
11/22 23:17, , 11F
主詞(the girl)的某種狀態
11/22 23:17, 11F
→
11/22 23:20, , 12F
而且Playing the piano, the girl did not know it.
11/22 23:20, 12F
→
11/22 23:22, , 13F
不太像是從對等子句改過來的，因為對等子句改過來的
11/22 23:22, 13F
→
11/22 23:22, , 14F
分構通常會放在主句後面......
11/22 23:22, 14F
→
11/23 08:41, , 15F
主要是想問看到分詞構句怎麼判斷是不是從關係子句減化來的
11/23 08:41, 15F
→
11/23 08:42, , 16F
例句只是舉例, 謝謝
11/23 08:42, 16F
‣ 更多 snob2 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1OD5cf7x (Eng-Class)