一題文法題 請問該選哪一個?

看板Eng-Class作者 (tucson)時間7年前 (2016/08/11 21:13), 7年前編輯推噓4(4推 0噓 9→)
留言13則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
John's mother left him when he was a baby. His was brought up by his aunt. His aunt took care of him as if she _____ his own mother. (A) Is (B) was (C) were (D) had been 可以解釋一下所該答案的原因嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.44.240 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1470921224.A.0B0.html
→
08/11 21:29, , 1F
C 假設語氣
08/11 21:29, 1F
推
08/11 21:32, , 2F
as if(宛如、好像)子句為假設法，與現在事實相反，be
08/11 21:32, 2F
→
08/11 21:32, , 3F
動詞一律用were
08/11 21:32, 3F
推
08/11 22:06, , 4F
D吧 這是與“過去”事實相反的假設欸
08/11 22:06, 4F
這句話本來就是應該用假設語氣。重點在於要選與現在事實相反的were還是要與過去事實 相反的had been呢？大家覺得該怎麼選呢? ※ 編輯: tucson (223.138.44.240), 08/11/2016 22:27:45
→
08/12 00:03, , 5F
正確答案是d嗎? 我覺得是d
08/12 00:03, 5F
→
08/12 01:32, , 6F
是不是兒子，真相只有 true or false 哪有過去式。We
08/12 01:32, 6F
→
08/12 01:32, , 7F
re 就對了。
08/12 01:32, 7F
推
08/12 01:34, , 8F
were
08/12 01:34, 8F
推
08/12 02:20, , 9F
認為是與過去事實相反的可能是覺得當年抱錯小孩之類的（誤
08/12 02:20, 9F
→
08/12 02:20, , 10F
）
08/12 02:20, 10F
→
08/14 20:21, , 11F
were。與事實相反地假設。血緣關係沒有「過於」或「現在」
08/14 20:21, 11F
→
08/14 20:22, , 12F
口語上was也是可接受的答案。written English就不行
08/14 20:22, 12F
→
08/21 15:56, , 13F
現在也不是他媽啊 與現在事實相反沒錯啊
08/21 15:56, 13F
‣ 更多 tucson 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Nh7e82m (Eng-Class)