[請益] 請問兩個簡單文法題

看板Eng-Class作者 (無敵干物女)時間8年前 (2015/12/12 11:43), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 14→)
留言16則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
if the person thought clearly that something valuable no means to sell (be sold) in (at) such a low price and was able to control their greediness (desire), they wouldn’t be conned. if a person thought clearly that something valuable was by no means to sell at such a low price and was able to control his desire, they wouldn't be conned. 如果想清楚貴重物品是絕不可能以如此低價賣出，而且可以控制自己的慾望，就 不會受騙。 請問to sell 那邊是不是應該要改成to be sold 才對呢？ 另一題是： The same thing, _____, would have been disastrous. A)had it happened in crowded places B)if happened in crowded places C)if had happened in crowded places D)if has happened in crowded places 為什麼答案是A呢？？有請指教。 謝謝喔！ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.136.193.8 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1449891815.A.38D.html
→
12/12 14:37, , 1F
第二題，與過去事實相反的假設語氣
12/12 14:37, 1F
→
12/12 14:38, , 2F
可省略 if 並倒裝句
12/12 14:38, 2F
→
12/12 18:42, , 3F
謝謝回答。請問這裡的倒裝有什麼特別用意嗎？
12/12 18:42, 3F
推
12/12 19:27, , 4F
為了考你懂不懂倒裝
12/12 19:27, 4F
→
12/12 19:55, , 5F
12/12 19:55, 5F
→
12/12 20:26, , 6F
推j大，考你認不認的出來他是假設語氣
12/12 20:26, 6F
→
12/12 20:27, , 7F
所以假設語氣的變形還是要認得
12/12 20:27, 7F
→
12/12 20:27, , 8F
老師以前說，假設語氣就是如果（if...)
12/12 20:27, 8F
→
12/12 20:28, , 9F
為了簡化，所以移掉 if，再倒裝
12/12 20:28, 9F
→
12/15 09:32, , 10F
如果說寫成happened in crowded places也是ok的囉？
12/15 09:32, 10F
→
12/15 09:32, , 11F
分詞構句的用法
12/15 09:32, 11F
推
12/15 09:33, , 12F
不可以
12/15 09:33, 12F
→
12/15 09:34, , 13F
happening in crowded places嗎？所以倒裝的話要留
12/15 09:34, 13F
→
12/15 09:35, , 14F
改掉的話好像變直述語氣了
12/15 09:35, 14F
→
12/15 09:36, , 15F
確認一下。所以空格只是單純假設語氣的倒裝並非
12/15 09:36, 15F
→
12/15 09:36, , 16F
分詞構句嗎？
12/15 09:36, 16F
‣ 更多 SunkfBeauty 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1MQvVdED (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 SunkfBeauty 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1MQvVdED (Eng-Class)