[請益] I've had TV people come up to me

看板Eng-Class作者 (和平使者5566)時間8年前 (2015/11/16 16:26), 8年前編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 11→)
留言11則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
I've had TV people come up to me and say that I owe the world more than an explanation regarding Abby and Brittany. 請問come up可以前面加不定詞to嗎 改成I've had TV people to come up to me 我不太懂這句的文法結構 請問這裡的have是當使役動詞動嗎? 感謝大家幫忙 出處:https://www.hopenglish.com/come-up-3 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 113.196.154.130 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1447662398.A.484.html ※ 編輯: peace5566 (113.196.154.130), 11/16/2015 16:32:55 ※ 編輯: peace5566 (113.196.154.130), 11/16/2015 16:38:05
→
11/16 21:43, , 1F
have是使役動詞，後面直接接原型動詞
11/16 21:43, 1F
→
11/16 23:06, , 2F
have不是使役動詞。"Practical English Usage" (M. Swan)
11/16 23:06, 2F
→
11/16 23:06, , 3F
倒是可以將這句型收納進關代章節裡頭的"omission of subj
11/16 23:06, 3F
→
11/16 23:06, , 4F
ect": In a very informal style, a subject relative pr
11/16 23:06, 4F
→
11/16 23:07, , 5F
onoun is sometimes dropped after 'there is'.
11/16 23:07, 5F
→
11/16 23:07, , 6F
I've had TV people (who) come up ...
11/16 23:07, 6F
→
11/16 23:08, , 7F
光是"TV people"就是一個線索(整句"very informal"，所以
11/16 23:08, 7F
→
11/16 23:08, , 8F
不需要花時間去鑽文法結構)
11/16 23:08, 8F
→
11/16 23:08, , 9F
開頭的I've had不是重點。整句改成There're/There have
11/16 23:08, 9F
→
11/16 23:09, , 10F
been TV people .... 意思一樣
11/16 23:09, 10F
→
11/18 16:03, , 11F
感謝2F
11/18 16:03, 11F
‣ 更多 peace5566 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1MIPC-I4 (Eng-Class)