[考題] 請問分詞構句問題

看板Eng-Class作者 (來去自在)時間11年前 (2014/09/15 15:36), 11年前編輯推噓7(7推 0噓 36→)
留言43則, 9人參與, 最新討論串1/1
各位大大好 小弟看到一個考題我的主觀判定要選C但是又好像看過Being可以不要省略 請問這一題CD是不是都可以選? 改謝 __________ some money, the child ran out of the house. (A) Giving (B) Having given (C) Given (D) Being given -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.213.66 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1410766606.A.BE0.html
→
09/15 15:52, , 1F
吸 應該不行喔
09/15 15:52, 1F
→
09/15 16:20, , 2F
我查了資料being 接相當於形容詞的過去分詞才可以
09/15 16:20, 2F
→
09/15 16:20, , 3F
如果是動作是不可以省略的 所以應該繼續用
09/15 16:20, 3F
※ 編輯: Heterocyclic (61.230.213.66), 09/15/2014 16:20:45
→
09/15 16:20, , 4F
being given對嗎???
09/15 16:20, 4F
推
09/15 16:35, , 5F
不好意思，太久沒讀考試用英文，很多文法都只能作答，而不
09/15 16:35, 5F
→
09/15 16:35, , 6F
能解釋了。等更厲害的板友說明吧
09/15 16:35, 6F
→
09/15 17:34, , 7F
要把be動詞寫出來的話，應該是"having been given"
09/15 17:34, 7F
→
09/15 17:35, , 8F
"being given"是「現在」拿到錢的意思
09/15 17:35, 8F
推
09/15 18:46, , 9F
但have given也有一直拿錢的可能性啊XD 應該是說拿到錢，
09/15 18:46, 9F
→
09/15 18:46, , 10F
就這一次的動作，就跑出門了
09/15 18:46, 10F
推
09/15 18:51, , 11F
這原句應該是the child was given吧
09/15 18:51, 11F
→
09/15 19:15, , 12F
"having given"是孩子拿錢給別人耶
09/15 19:15, 12F
→
09/15 19:18, , 13F
然後"given"的語感是很one-off的。要表示「收個不停」，需
09/15 19:18, 13F
→
09/15 19:18, , 14F
要回到主動式句子：
09/15 19:18, 14F
→
09/15 19:19, , 15F
"the child has been receiving..." 或者
09/15 19:19, 15F
→
09/15 19:19, , 16F
"someone has been giving the child..."
09/15 19:19, 16F
→
09/15 19:21, , 17F
如果你不用被動句型就會死，那要多加個「一直」去修飾
09/15 19:21, 17F
→
09/15 19:22, , 18F
"having been continuously given..."
09/15 19:22, 18F
→
09/15 22:17, , 19F
這個英檢教材的話答案是給"Being given ...."(選項裡頭沒
09/15 22:17, 19F
→
09/15 22:18, , 20F
有"Given ...") http://ppt.cc/RIy0
09/15 22:18, 20F
→
09/15 22:18, , 21F
問題倒不是在於Given或是Being given，而是這是非英語母
09/15 22:18, 21F
→
09/15 22:18, , 22F
語的人寫出來的句子，不管怎麼改都是怪
09/15 22:18, 22F
推
09/15 22:36, , 23F
我是這樣理解分詞構句的:有兩個句子主詞是同一個,這個主詞
09/15 22:36, 23F
→
09/15 22:37, , 24F
在前後句子可能各作了,或碰到某件事,然後兩件事有點緊密
09/15 22:37, 24F
→
09/15 22:38, , 25F
但是直接用and連結又遜遜的,所以會用分詞構句.
09/15 22:38, 25F
→
09/15 22:39, , 26F
所以你這原句應該是The child was given some money. The
09/15 22:39, 26F
→
09/15 22:40, , 27F
child ran out of the house.變成分詞構句的話,前半當然是
09/15 22:40, 27F
→
09/15 22:40, , 28F
就...這一題語意不清阿XD 是要說小孩子拿到錢可以買東西所
09/15 22:40, 28F
→
09/15 22:40, , 29F
Being given some money, the child... 當然,修辭美感上,
09/15 22:40, 29F
→
09/15 22:41, , 30F
以跑出門了？還是要說小孩子給人家錢之後耍害羞的跑走了？
09/15 22:41, 30F
→
09/15 22:41, , 31F
你這個例子完全不知所云...但是我完全懂它邏輯,就是玩文法
09/15 22:41, 31F
→
09/15 22:42, , 32F
古時候我們都是這樣學起來的...現在還這樣的話,ㄟ......
09/15 22:42, 32F
→
09/15 22:42, , 33F
我認為如果改成After being given some money, the child
09/15 22:42, 33F
→
09/15 22:43, , 34F
ran out of house.會好很多,有那種一拿到錢就落跑的感覺~~~
09/15 22:43, 34F
推
09/15 22:47, , 35F
看了一下dunchee大神找到的那個講義,說真的,越看越迷糊...
09/15 22:47, 35F
→
09/15 22:47, , 36F
一整個覺得自己不會英文了~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
09/15 22:47, 36F
推
09/16 11:29, , 37F
因為為 given 還有別的用法，我比較難想像會有人說 C 這樣
09/16 11:29, 37F
→
09/16 11:29, , 38F
的句子，雖然文法好像沒什麼不對
09/16 11:29, 38F
→
09/16 11:44, , 39F
商教英檢那題句末多了happily 意思應該有清楚點(考
09/16 11:44, 39F
→
09/16 11:45, , 40F
題都是這樣抄來抄去的嗎? )
09/16 11:45, 40F
推
09/16 15:38, , 41F
這種英文老師可能會看不懂　他們不太會這樣講這是台式英文
09/16 15:38, 41F
→
09/16 15:39, , 42F
After getting some money from his momey, ....還比較通
09/16 15:39, 42F
→
09/25 03:59, , 43F
當然是 D 毫無疑問
09/25 03:59, 43F
‣ 更多 Heterocyclic 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1K5fSElW (Eng-Class)