[請益] 文法檢查

看板Eng-Class作者 (Maki)時間11年前 (2014/08/16 11:39), 11年前編輯推噓0(0017)
留言17則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
這是我參考網路別人的寫法自己整理重寫的,請問文法上面有錯誤嗎? 黃色部分是我覺得比較有可能錯的,空格是用來放名詞子句的 還請大家幫忙檢查一下~謝謝 The reading passage and the speaker both discuss the topic of _____. However, the speaker disagrees with the ideas in the reading passage. He thinks that _____ in the reading passage is questionable and offers several reasons to oppose the article. First of all, the reading passage mentions that _____, and therefore _____. But the speaker says that _____. Thus, the speaker believes _____. The second reason which the lecturer refers to a disproof is that _____. Although the article states _____, he notes that _____. Hence, the lecturer concludes that _____. Finally, the author of reading passage claims that _____, whereas the orator points out that _____. As a result, the orator considers that _____, and that contradicts what the reading passage indicates. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.254.241.246 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1408160392.A.8EC.html

08/16 19:15, , 1F
claim我認為不妥 畢竟文章不會claim 其他文法OK
08/16 19:15, 1F

08/16 19:16, , 2F
應該是TOEFL模板吧 用字可以多變化一點 再加長結論段
08/16 19:16, 2F
謝謝~

08/17 01:11, , 3F
08/17 01:11, 3F

08/17 01:11, , 4F
第一個例句
08/17 01:11, 4F
謝謝~這個英文字典蠻好的耶~還有例句XD,之前看好多都沒例句 claim的用法我是抄某網站的,應該問題不大,謝囉

08/17 12:19, , 5F
不不不 report或技術文獻之類的當然能用claim 但用在
08/17 12:19, 5F

08/17 12:20, , 6F
reading passage 我個人是覺得怪 要是堅持用CL 我是會
08/17 12:20, 6F

08/17 12:20, , 7F
寫成the author of the reading passage claims...
08/17 12:20, 7F

08/17 12:21, , 8F
還能順便湊字數~
08/17 12:21, 8F

08/17 12:22, , 9F
對了 你後面用orator 前面也用"人"會比較好喔
08/17 12:22, 9F
謝謝~我改好了

08/17 18:26, , 10F
"several reasons to opposite the article"?
08/17 18:26, 10F

08/17 18:26, , 11F
opposite是形容詞喔
08/17 18:26, 11F

08/17 18:27, , 12F
即使改成oppose也很怪。雖然to oppose的確是「反對」的意思
08/17 18:27, 12F

08/17 18:28, , 13F
但是帶有「抵抗」的含意。
08/17 18:28, 13F

08/17 18:29, , 14F
一篇文章又沒強制力,就算你反對其論點也不到抵抗那麼嚴重
08/17 18:29, 14F

08/17 18:32, , 15F
我會說"...offers several counter-arguments..."
08/17 18:32, 15F

08/17 18:34, , 16F
啊,這裡用"opposing arguments"也可以。因為是你的論點對
08/17 18:34, 16F

08/17 18:34, , 17F
抗他的論點。
08/17 18:34, 17F
您好,因為是文章提出一個論點,而speaker提出反對的觀點 這樣應該符合您說的[抵抗]含意吧?請問您打的是which is opposing的簡化嗎 不好意思,文法沒很好XD,謝謝你提出來~網路上是打opposite...我沒發現這是形容詞 ※ 編輯: KurakiMaki (114.47.132.130), 08/17/2014 22:33:19
文章代碼(AID): #1JxjA8Zi (Eng-Class)