[文法] That price was more than XX times...

看板Eng-Class作者 (Takishi)時間11年前 (2014/02/12 12:47), 編輯推噓11(11推 0噓 21→)
留言32則, 7人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
有道考題是: The cup sold for more than one million dollars at an auction. That price was more than 400,000 times____ the seller had paid for it. 空格選項有 that, when, what, which. 請問答案是? (我不確定是不是that) --------- 另一題是" (As/Since/That/When) so vital an article was overlooked led Mr. Smith, director of the Museum, to organize an exhibition devoted to it. (意指一件價值不菲的骨董被忽略看漏是多重大的事...) 請問開頭用字是四個選項中的那個? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 163.32.125.29
→
02/12 12:51, , 1F
沒看過這種考題,打擊很大,煩請先進說明怎麼理解這種文法
02/12 12:51, 1F
推
02/12 15:03, , 2F
第一題是what (複合關係代名詞 即先行詞+關代)
02/12 15:03, 2F
→
02/12 15:04, , 3F
第二題我猜是that(不很確定) 以That開頭的名詞子句當
02/12 15:04, 3F
→
02/12 15:05, , 4F
主詞 不過 so vital an article was overlooked 不是
02/12 15:05, 4F
→
02/12 15:05, , 5F
很了解為何要寫成這樣
02/12 15:05, 5F
推
02/12 17:02, , 6F
第一題倍數後面是不是應該要有"than"阿？
02/12 17:02, 6F
推
02/12 17:24, , 7F
1 what/that都可,what是複合關代,that是代詞指the price
02/12 17:24, 7F
→
02/12 17:26, , 8F
表達倍數不加than:He's twice my age不是twice than my age
02/12 17:26, 8F
推
02/12 17:37, , 9F
如果是用 X times表倍數應該要有than阿 而且補上than
02/12 17:37, 9F
→
02/12 17:38, , 10F
整句就通順了 what包含先行詞和關代 後面缺少先行詞
02/12 17:38, 10F
→
02/12 17:39, , 11F
故用that和which都不對 且此處that應等於which
02/12 17:39, 11F
→
02/12 17:40, , 12F
如果that可以用 which應該也可以
02/12 17:40, 12F
推
02/12 17:48, , 13F
that是普通代詞不是關代.不能用需有先行詞的關代that/which
02/12 17:48, 13F
推
02/12 18:32, , 14F
樓上兩位 40000 times前面已經有more than了啊 把more
02/12 18:32, 14F
→
02/12 18:33, , 15F
than 移到 times後面就很清楚了 He is twice my age.
02/12 18:33, 15F
→
02/12 18:33, , 16F
他年紀是我兩倍 He is more than twice my age. 他年紀
02/12 18:33, 16F
→
02/12 18:33, , 17F
比我兩倍還大
02/12 18:33, 17F
推
02/12 18:39, , 18F
第一題用that文法是沒錯 只是念起來不太順 用了that
02/12 18:39, 18F
→
02/12 18:40, , 19F
但這個that不是當成關代 (通常有稍微停頓的效果) 只能
02/12 18:40, 19F
→
02/12 18:40, , 20F
說這是出題人的一個失誤了
02/12 18:40, 20F
推
02/12 18:46, , 21F
的確what比that頻繁,但that沒錯且可找到實例,如果考的不是
02/12 18:46, 21F
→
02/12 18:47, , 22F
哪個較常見,而是哪個正確,那麼兩個都對。
02/12 18:47, 22F
→
02/12 18:48, , 23F
"more than"在40,000 times前面和後面的意思大不同，移到後
02/12 18:48, 23F
→
02/12 18:49, , 24F
面意思就不同了。如果應要用than，且不改原意，還可這樣寫:
02/12 18:49, 24F
→
02/12 18:54, , 25F
A is more than 40,000 times more than B. 但原句是更常見
02/12 18:54, 25F
→
02/12 18:55, , 26F
的寫法。 ^硬要
02/12 18:55, 26F
→
02/12 19:11, , 27F
如果用that 我大概會寫...times that paid by the....
02/12 19:11, 27F
推
02/12 22:14, , 28F
1. 應該是that (the price) which = what 複合關代
02/12 22:14, 28F
→
02/12 22:15, , 29F
2. 也是that, 用That字句開頭
02/12 22:15, 29F
→
02/12 22:16, , 30F
That the article so vital was overlooked...倒裝
02/12 22:16, 30F
推
02/12 22:20, , 31F
1. what; 2. That
02/12 22:20, 31F
推
02/12 22:24, , 32F
我覺得第一題的which可以不寫，所以應該that也對
02/12 22:24, 32F
‣ 更多 anikitake 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I-lpXjX (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 anikitake 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I-lpXjX (Eng-Class)