[文法] 請問這段的時態如何決定?

看板Eng-Class作者creulfact (小黑)時間12年前 (2013/11/16 16:10)推噓2(2推 0噓 11→)

留言13則, 2人參與討論串1/1

America, for example, is a typical country of consumerism and by implementing the theory; America becomes world’s most influential country in aspects of economy and technology. 被修改成: America, for example, is a typical country led by consumerism and by implementing the theory; America became world’s most influential country in aspects of economy and technology. 請問一下這邊的led by是當什麼意思阿? 因為我去查英英字典他是寫 [transitive, intransitive] to be the best at something; to be in first place 問題1: 我原意是想表達:美國是個典型的消費主義國家 http://0rz.tw/qC6OW 英英字典原網址可是按字典意思這樣一改不就變成:美國是消費主義國家的領導者雖說在查字典前我覺得他這樣改掉之後意思變成:美國是個典型的以消費主義為指導原則的國家 (還是我這樣想的意思才是對的呢?) 問題2: 我有點不清楚時態: 美國成為經濟與科技上皆擁有最大影響力的國家這句話的時態become為什麼要用過去式呢? 因為目前為止美國仍是影響力最大的國家阿還是說這件事成為事實的時間點是在過去的十幾年前所以時態是過去式呢? 由於我作文是寄到國外修改因此都只會有word修訂跟底下的評語但我某些事情想不通也沒辦法問所以只好來板上麻煩大家了麻煩大家幫解惑了謝謝!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.137.125.123 ※ 編輯: creulfact 來自: 220.137.125.123 (11/16 16:14)

推

areca

11/16 20:23, , 1^F

11/16 20:23, 1^F

→

areca

11/16 20:26, , 2^F

11/16 20:26, 2^F

→

areca

11/16 20:27, , 3^F

11/16 20:27, 3^F

所謂的theory 就是前面的consumerism 只是前段話的延伸而已

→

areca

11/16 20:29, , 4^F

11/16 20:29, 4^F

其實這段話也不算有上下文因為他只是整段話裡頭的 example 純粹事實的描述不過謝謝你的回應喔!^^ 以下是我所寫的整段話: Nowadays, economy of a country develops through endless growth of consumption. This helps build a complete supply chain of the industry, which provides lots of jobs and reduces poverty. Furthermore, consumerism encourages people to pursue the newest and best products, which could promote the whole industry to upgrade its technology and product innovation. America, for example, is a typical country led by consumerism and by implementing the theory; America became world's most influential country in aspects of economy and technology. ※ 編輯: creulfact 來自: 220.137.125.123 (11/16 22:07)

→

dunchee

11/17 02:12, , 5^F

11/17 02:12, 5^F

→

dunchee

11/17 02:12, , 6^F

11/17 02:12, 6^F

→

dunchee

11/17 02:12, , 7^F

11/17 02:12, 7^F