[請益] 哪句對?

看板Eng-Class作者 (新年快樂)時間12年前 (2013/09/11 13:59), 編輯推噓7(7推 0噓 22→)
留言29則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/1
She left before I had the chance to say. She had left before I had the chance to say. thanks! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 210.66.169.248
推
09/11 14:20, , 1F
我覺得都可以 ，語意有些許不同
09/11 14:20, 1F
→
09/11 14:21, , 2F
完成aspect的意涵有點麻煩，很多可以講的
09/11 14:21, 2F
→
09/11 15:49, , 3F
what's the difference?thanks
09/11 15:49, 3F
推
09/11 16:09, , 4F
等我喔 ，用手機打太困難
09/11 16:09, 4F
推
09/11 17:48, , 5F
1.我有機會說之前她離開了.2.我有機會說之前她就已經離開了
09/11 17:48, 5F
→
09/11 17:50, , 6F
細微的差別在於2的情況,還沒講之前人就離開一陣子了,
09/11 17:50, 6F
→
09/11 17:51, , 7F
1的情況有可能是正要說,她就轉身離開,這樣講您了解嗎?
09/11 17:51, 7F
→
09/11 17:52, , 8F
以下是延伸閱讀(抱歉術語我都忘記了):同樣是現在進行式,
09/11 17:52, 8F
→
09/11 17:53, , 9F
下列三個有什麼不一樣? 1.leaving 2.eating 3.jumping
09/11 17:53, 9F
→
09/11 17:53, , 10F
很複雜喔,可以想想看,很有趣的,想通文法功力會躍進!
09/11 17:53, 10F
→
09/11 22:15, , 11F
英文不喜歡太多贅字
09/11 22:15, 11F
推
09/11 23:31, , 12F
什麼語言都不喜歡“贅字”，但是had絕不會是贅字
09/11 23:31, 12F
推
09/12 00:00, , 13F
要看贅字的定義，完全無義的字才是贅字的話，這裡的
09/12 00:00, 13F
推
09/12 00:03, , 14F
had不是贅字。但這兩句話一定較多數母語人士會選上句
09/12 00:03, 14F
→
09/12 00:45, , 15F
可以這麼說.其實單句這樣判斷比較沒太大意義,要有前後文
09/12 00:45, 15F
→
09/12 00:45, , 16F
真要認真討論文法,應該是要這樣才對
09/12 00:45, 16F
→
09/12 21:52, , 17F
兩句都錯。say後頭少了受詞 (這該不會是Maroon 5的歌？是
09/12 21:52, 17F
→
09/12 21:52, , 18F
的話你少列了下一個歌詞(say的受詞 ... to say the words
09/12 21:52, 18F
→
09/12 21:52, , 19F
that ...)
09/12 21:52, 19F
→
09/12 21:52, , 20F
這樣子的話就可以: She left before I had anything to
09/12 21:52, 20F
→
09/12 21:52, , 21F
say. ("anything"也是say的受詞)
09/12 21:52, 21F
推
09/12 22:46, , 22F
樓上沒解釋有無had的差異
09/12 22:46, 22F
→
09/13 00:53, , 23F
如果有前後文,比如說, A: She left before I had the chance
09/13 00:53, 23F
→
09/13 00:53, , 24F
to say. B: Say what? A:Say I love her. 請問第一句有錯嗎?
09/13 00:53, 24F
→
09/13 00:54, , 25F
所以我老是講1.盡量給前後文(除非是考試題目,沒彈性的) 2.
09/13 00:54, 25F
→
09/13 00:55, , 26F
請用描述語法的角度思考.事實上,很多句子就不會"不合文法"了
09/13 00:55, 26F
→
09/13 00:56, , 27F
所以他想問的重點我認為不在say後面有無受詞,而是had的差異
09/13 00:56, 27F
→
09/13 00:56, , 28F
還是請原po自己說明一下?
09/13 00:56, 28F
→
09/13 01:00, , 29F
請不要誤會以為我要筆戰,我是很誠懇的來討論的,請多包涵
09/13 01:00, 29F
‣ 更多 Miere 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1IC0RJd9 (Eng-Class)