[文法] which has/have/had + p.p. 的省略

看板Eng-Class作者 (ak1290)時間13年前 (2012/11/01 13:23), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 20→)
留言22則, 7人參與, 6年前最新討論串1/1
舉一個句子為例: He had an accident before, which has caused him much inconvenience. 如果這裡不用 which， 在不影響原意和時態下 改成怎麼樣才是正確的呢? 我自己可能會這樣寫: He had an accident before, causing him much inconvenience. 但是似乎就失去present perfect的時態了。 如果更進一步，舉另外兩個類似的句子: ..., which had caused him much inconvenience. 以及 ..., which caused him much inconvenience. 如果不用which又該如何修改呢? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.41.55
推
11/01 13:46, , 1F
"He" 還活著嗎?
11/01 13:46, 1F
→
11/01 13:54, , 2F
把accident看成injury好了XD
11/01 13:54, 2F
→
11/01 14:00, , 3F
"He" 是否還活著 或 "He"是否現在已經痊癒了 會影響句子的
11/01 14:00, 3F
→
11/01 14:00, , 4F
表達
11/01 14:00, 4F
→
11/01 14:06, , 5F
第一句的"has caused"已經清楚表達了還活著 但尚未痊癒
11/01 14:06, 5F
→
11/01 15:53, , 6F
an accident has caused him much inconvenience
11/01 15:53, 6F
→
11/01 17:53, , 7F
如果He had an accident這一段保持不變的話呢?
11/01 17:53, 7F
推
11/01 20:34, , 8F
, and it has caused him much inconvenience?
11/01 20:34, 8F
→
11/01 20:42, , 9F
也是一個選擇。那接上having caused much...呢
11/01 20:42, 9F
→
11/01 22:29, , 10F
主詞不一致而省略 dangling modifier ?
11/01 22:29, 10F
→
11/01 22:30, , 11F
不過我文法也不強就是了^^
11/01 22:30, 11F
→
11/02 00:22, , 12F
"但是似乎就失去..."--> Yes. 以你問的"reduced relative
11/02 00:22, 12F
→
11/02 00:22, , 13F
clause(的一種)"來說，既然有經過reduction，在某程度上一
11/02 00:22, 13F
→
11/02 00:23, , 14F
些訊息就得跟著犧牲：(然後我用關鍵字搜尋Google Books，
11/02 00:23, 14F
→
11/02 00:23, , 15F
一下就找到一堆相關的書): http://ppt.cc/ST2d (Note:最
11/02 00:23, 15F
→
11/02 00:24, , 16F
後的'should be regarded as "...."..'指的是符合"firmly
11/02 00:24, 16F
→
11/02 00:24, , 17F
....generalizable"條件的才適合這樣子reduce 總結就是不
11/02 00:24, 17F
→
11/02 00:25, , 18F
要亂化簡(這不是像數學公式那樣"="來"="去的變化就沒事的)
11/02 00:25, 18F
→
08/06 07:50, , 19F
"He" 是否還活著 https://muxiv.com
08/06 07:50, 19F
→
09/07 00:08, , 20F
09/07 00:08, 20F
→
12/02 18:25, , 21F
"He" 是否還活著 https://daxiv.com
12/02 18:25, 21F
→
04/13 22:43, 6年前 , 22F
些訊息就得跟著犧牲：( http://yaxiv.com
04/13 22:43, 22F
‣ 更多 ak1290 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1GaWSyID (Eng-Class)