[文法] being的用法

看板Eng-Class作者 (Chiaoy)時間13年前 (2012/10/23 18:41), 編輯推噓0(0014)
留言14則, 4人參與, 6年前最新討論串1/1
And I was particularly interested because I wanted to see one of these cables being built. _____ 這句是在看TED時候,然後演講者說的一句話,我自己的解讀是: And I was particularly interested because I wanted to see one of these cables "that were " built. 請問是因為這樣的關係嗎? 還是我的解讀是錯的,請幫我糾正一下 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 112.104.205.110

10/23 23:28, , 1F
that were being built.要強調目睹建的過程
10/23 23:28, 1F

10/24 01:08, , 2F
我換個方式說明。比如這兩個和"see"有關的用法:
10/24 01:08, 2F

10/24 01:08, , 3F
1. I saw Mary cross the road.
10/24 01:08, 3F

10/24 01:08, , 4F
2. I saw Mary crossing the road. (如果這裡的"crossing
10/24 01:08, 4F

10/24 01:09, , 5F
是關代變來的,那麼 1 的情況怎麼辦?)(這和關係子句無關-
10/24 01:09, 5F

10/24 01:09, , 6F
-> 重點不是在強調/特指"(正在)過路"的那個特定的Mary(難
10/24 01:09, 6F

10/24 01:10, , 7F
道還有...做其它動作的另外的Mary? 所以要用"限定"關係子
10/24 01:10, 7F

10/24 01:10, , 8F
句來特別指定/加以區分? No. 所以這不是關係子句的用法)
10/24 01:10, 8F

10/24 01:10, , 9F
以TED原文來說,演講者的重點是要看"特定的"cable(s)本身
10/24 01:10, 9F

10/24 01:10, , 10F
?還是要看到(某所指東西)being build的這個過程?
10/24 01:10, 10F

08/06 07:49, , 11F
以TED原文來說,演講 https://muxiv.com
08/06 07:49, 11F

09/07 00:07, , 12F
是關代變來的,那麼 1 https://daxiv.com
09/07 00:07, 12F

12/02 18:24, , 13F
-> 重點不是在強調/ https://noxiv.com
12/02 18:24, 13F

04/13 22:42, 6年前 , 14F
是關代變來的,那麼 1 http://yaxiv.com
04/13 22:42, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1GXdHZVI (Eng-Class)