[文法] since和過去完成式

看板Eng-Class作者時間13年前 (2012/08/11 13:20), 編輯推噓2(2015)
留言17則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
1.年級:高二上 2.科目:英文 3.章節:遠東第一課 4.題目:Jane, who had been interested in astrology since entering college, asked Christine to find out when her classmates were born. 5.想法: 昨天看到學生課本上學校老師把since entering代換成since she entered 但是這樣不就無法表現enter college這個動作發生在ask Christine之前? 是不是應該改為since she had entered呢? 但如此一來 since 前後的句子都變成過去完成式...感覺怪怪的 麻煩各位指點一下 謝謝~ ※ 編輯: dolphan 來自: 114.36.97.17 (08/11 13:22)

08/11 13:26, , 1F
怎覺得是要改had been-->has been..
08/11 13:26, 1F

08/11 13:27, , 2F
然後..關代who子句不一定得跟主句有時序關係
08/11 13:27, 2F

08/11 13:31, , 3F
感謝D大回答 但這篇文章通篇都用過去式 應該不能has been
08/11 13:31, 3F

08/11 13:33, , 4F
我也在想是否應忽略關代子句跟主句的時序 但是不知何時
08/11 13:33, 4F

08/11 13:33, , 5F
該忽略何時不該忽略...
08/11 13:33, 5F

08/11 14:05, , 6F
他上次改一篇作文,改到時態也是錯很多.
08/11 14:05, 6F

08/11 23:59, , 7F
"since she had entered ..." 也可以。
08/11 23:59, 7F

08/11 23:59, , 8F
"是否應忽略..."->倒不是忽不忽略的問題,因為本來就沒
08/11 23:59, 8F

08/12 00:00, , 9F
有忽略。換個角度來看...->
08/12 00:00, 9F


08/12 01:15, , 11F
非常感謝樓上d大詳盡的解說!我也有到國外的論壇發問
08/12 01:15, 11F

08/12 01:16, , 12F
有個英國人認為since she had entered 聽來不自然且沒必要
08/12 01:16, 12F

08/12 01:16, , 13F
但另外一個英國人覺得兩個都正確且聽起來也都OK
08/12 01:16, 13F

08/12 01:17, , 14F
也提供您參考~
08/12 01:17, 14F

08/14 03:57, , 15F
拍謝,had ved since had ved的用法我不太熟悉,誤導到了,
08/14 03:57, 15F

08/14 03:58, , 16F
不過我私信問dunchee,他意思是我的說法也是沒錯的,只是這
08/14 03:58, 16F

08/14 03:59, , 17F
不需要改成我說的
08/14 03:59, 17F
文章代碼(AID): #1G9UkP4L (Eng-Class)