[請益] 請問no one was less likely...

看板Eng-Class作者 (夢想起始號)時間13年前 (2012/08/03 22:21), 編輯推噓1(1推 0噓 20→)
留言21則, 6人參與, 6年前最新討論串1/1
最近在讀傲慢與偏見 請問以下這句 "It was necessary to make this circumstance a matter of pleasure, because on such occasions it is the etiquette, but no one was less likely than Mrs. Bennet to find comfort in staying at home at any period of her life. " 請問這句話中的no one was less likely的意思到底是? Mrs. Bennet到底喜不喜歡待在家裡呢?還是喜歡外出應酬? 每次碰到這種雙重否定的字句就很苦惱~.~還請版友解惑 非常感謝!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.171.74.176
→
08/03 22:36, , 1F
Mrs. Bennet不喜歡留在家
08/03 22:36, 1F
→
08/03 23:03, , 2F
這樣子看。以"(Someone) was likely to find comfort ....
08/03 23:03, 2F
→
08/03 23:03, , 3F
"這件事來看，然後在"likely"上分程度:
08/03 23:03, 3F
→
08/03 23:03, , 4F
(Someone : 以 Mrs. Bennet 和 隨便任一人來比較)
08/03 23:03, 4F
→
08/03 23:04, , 5F
<- less likely more likely->
08/03 23:04, 5F
→
08/03 23:04, , 6F
(-負) -----------------------------(+)
08/03 23:04, 6F
→
08/03 23:04, , 7F
那麼"no one"意思是無法找到比Mrs. Bennet 更不.... ->
08/03 23:04, 7F
→
08/03 23:04, , 8F
Mrs. Bennet已經是上圖的最左端(所以不會有人比她「更」
08/03 23:04, 8F
→
08/03 23:04, , 9F
less likely ....) 換句話說 Mrs. Bennet 已經是極不可
08/03 23:04, 9F
→
08/03 23:04, , 10F
能會find comfort .... (當然這整個只是個表達手法)
08/03 23:04, 10F
→
08/03 23:21, , 11F
喔喔 實在是太感謝樓上兩位了!! 邏輯解釋得很清楚^^
08/03 23:21, 11F
推
08/04 06:56, , 12F
通常看到雙重否定就把兩處否定字眼拿掉在看就清楚了
08/04 06:56, 12F
→
08/04 06:57, , 13F
everyone was likely that Bennet to find comfort...
08/04 06:57, 13F
→
08/04 06:57, , 14F
*than
08/04 06:57, 14F
→
08/04 06:58, , 15F
*more
08/04 06:58, 15F
→
08/04 06:59, , 16F
抱歉，應該是說把兩處否定字眼改成肯定。如果do not->do就
08/04 06:59, 16F
→
08/04 06:59, , 17F
變成"拿掉"XD
08/04 06:59, 17F
→
08/06 07:38, , 18F
(-負) ------ https://muxiv.com
08/06 07:38, 18F
→
09/07 00:01, , 19F
09/07 00:01, 19F
→
12/02 18:19, , 20F
Mrs. Bennet https://daxiv.com
12/02 18:19, 20F
→
04/13 22:36, 6年前 , 21F
(-負) ------ https://moxox.com
04/13 22:36, 21F
‣ 更多 leadingflame 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1G6zvtcG (Eng-Class)