[文法] 請問一下這句的文法

看板Eng-Class作者時間13年前 (2011/02/23 21:26), 編輯推噓1(1推 0噓 8→)
留言9則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
出處: http://tinyurl.com/6fctdeb 有問題的句子為: Instead, they said the contractor — a Taiwanese-owned company called Wintek — had pressed them and many other affected workers to resign and accept cash settlements that would absolve the factory of future liability, charges the company denied. 這一段只有一句 我有問題的是 , charges the company denied 我的認知是charges是名詞，在這一句中當同位語用，表Wintek強迫員工辭職 跟接受和解金這兩件事。 想請問一下我的認知是對的嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.219.45.237
→
02/23 21:30, , 1F
accept cash settlements...charges同位
02/23 21:30, 1F
→
02/23 21:42, , 2F
如果charges是settlements的同位語的話
02/23 21:42, 2F
→
02/23 21:43, , 3F
那為什麼company denied?前面說是pressed them to acce
02/23 21:43, 3F
→
02/24 01:47, , 4F
這樣子看: ..., (which are) charges the company denied.
02/24 01:47, 4F
→
02/24 01:49, , 5F
"which"指的是前頭的(你寫的)那整件事(主要是指控1+指控2+
02/24 01:49, 5F
→
02/24 01:50, , 6F
中文不大好表達那種"複數"觀念
02/24 01:50, 6F
→
02/24 01:50, , 7F
這類表達方式很普遍，多接觸就會讀得很自然
02/24 01:50, 7F
→
02/24 07:40, , 8F
所以我文中所表達的認知是對的?
02/24 07:40, 8F
推
02/24 20:45, , 9F
yes
02/24 20:45, 9F
‣ 更多 leslielion 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1DPGiCTO (Eng-Class)